GYMN-L Digest - 8 Jul 1996 to 9 Jul 1996
There
are 18 messages totalling 435 lines in this
issue.
Topics of the day:
1. GYMN-L Digest - 7 Jul 1996 - Special
issue
2. Spring
3. Associated Press Stories
4. American Cup 1996
5. ALISA BLOWS
6. Moceanu
doesn't drink coke?
7.
Commentators
8. Womens Euros and other stuff...
9. Moceanu's
injury
10. vault
start values
11. Rythmic Gymnastics
12. Olympics Tickets!!!
13. How to Unsubscribe/Switch Formats
(GYMN Admin)
14. response to RSG questions and reports
15. RSG on TV
16. RSG group questions
17. Tickets Wanted!!!
18. WAG predictions
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:29:39
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Re: GYMN-L Digest - 7 Jul 1996 - Special issue
In a message dated
96-07-08 15:33:34 EDT, you write:
<<
The vault and beam results looked
right. But on floor, again, how in
the
world
was Podkopayeva better than Kochetkova?
I saw it as: 1) Kochetkova,
2) Milosovichi, 3) Podkopayeva.
Seriously, was
Kochetkova judged out of a 9.9? I mean, Pod
messed up slightly on three out
of four landings
and Kochetkova was absolutely beautiful.
Is Podkopayeva
the new Cinderella that can do no wrong?
Eaffie
>>
What are you completely against Podkopayeva,? Yes, I agree with you on bars,
but
some judges don't see from our point of view. And on floor I thought
Kochetkova's floor was simply not vibrant and was boring
she didn't have all
the combined elements of
tumbling and dance and even the commentators thought
that
she should win
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:48:00
EDT
From: ***@PSUVM.PSU.EDU
Subject:
Spring
In the line of talking about springy gymnasts, I forgot who
started it,
but while Moceanu
and Chusovitina are both really springy, I'd have
to
put a few gymnasts above them in the spring
category: Zmeskal, Brandy
Johnson, and Cristina Bontas. They
all had real spring, but I view
Bontas and Chuso as having more solid spring and the other three
as
having bounce. Also, we need to be careful about the
weight issues--I
don't think Mirgordskaya
was overweight (no gymnast is) at worlds, and
if
she is slimmer now, I don't think that is the reason her gymnastics
is improved. It
doesn't affect me too much but in teh past I've
struggled with problems like this. And it was much publicized how at
1989
World Trials the commentators first said that Christy Henrich
"slimmed down and looks great." We've just gotta be really careful for
the
young gymnasts' sakes.
:) Joy
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 21:37:23
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Associated Press Stories
Hi everyone!
I found a couple very
short but interesting stories on the Prodigy Associated
Press Online service.
I'm sorry -- I don't know how to access it over the
internet.
1) AP surveyed "sports editors,
columnists, writers, sportcasters and
commentators" to find out which sports they think
should be dropped from the
Summer Olympics and which should be added. Rhythmic gymnastics was the 3rd
least popular sport -- 57% of those surveyed said it should
be dropped. The
least favorite was sailboarding (69% for dropping it), 63%
wanted to drop
synchronized swimming and 53%
didn't like beach volleyball. 42%
said they
wanted golf added to the schedule! After all, there isn't enough golf
on
already.(sarcasm)
2) The Romanian team
left Bucharest Sunday for Atlanta.
There are a couple
quotes
in the short article. Milosovici says, "We leave with big thoughts,
both for the team and individuals." Gogean says,
"We want to get as many
medals as
possible."
I'M SHOCKED!!
:-)
Also, All Around Magazine said today that Ivan Ivankov tore his tendon while
training
in North Carolina. He'll be going
back to Belarus and won't be in
the Olympics. That's really too bad, and a loss for
Belarus. I personally
was looking forward to
seeing him dual with Scherbo. Oh well.
See ya!
-- Tammy
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 21:50:10 -0400
From: ***@KENT.NET
Subject:
American Cup 1996
Was the 1996 American Cup televised? If anyone has a tape
of it, could they please contact me? Yvonne Tousek,
my
favourite gymnast,
won the silver medal, apparently, and
I would love to see it on tape. I will pay for a copy and postage
or I could try to copy it myself if you sent me the
tape.
Please help!
Jordynn
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:04:13
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
ALISA BLOWS
ALisa,
First of all I dont appreciate you bashing me and publicizing my
personal
comments to you on the digest which were
untrue anyway. First of all, the
whole reason this
argument began was from you misquoting me and twisting my
opinions around. I am sorry to waste everyones
time for writing this but I
thought I had to
defend myself from this pirana.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:17:58
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Moceanu doesn't drink coke?
hi,
Well, this is sort of a tangent to the subject of
gymnastics, but according
to a blurb in the
Detroit Free Press yesterday, Dominique Moceanu
claims to
never have drinken
a Coke. Funny, I thought someone
posted on here that she
drank about 5 during
nationals. Oh well,
~Liz
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:24:56
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Commentators
Okay, since no one has really said what they thought
about the commentator
comparison, I will tell
y'all what I think. My favorite is
Kathy Johnson.
She just seems
nice and excited about the sport and usually has interesting
things to say. I
just basically laugh at Tim Dagget for the one-liners
he
constatly pulls out (ie "in a bucket on the landing!") Bart's pretty good. I
personally think it's kinda cool
that a pretty famous non-gymnastics person,
John Tesh, knows so much about
the sport. And I think he really
does, too.
He has said some
background information about gymnasts kinda
off-handedly,
not like anyone had propted him.
But I got annoyed with the whole "go and
no-go
zone" that he repeated every 5 seconds during trials.
Anyway, none of
this was bashing, because way down deep, I love all
commentators
the same. (AWWW...)
~Liz
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:46:38
-0400
From: ***@KENT.NET
Subject:
Re: Womens Euros and other stuff...
>
>>I'm
so glad I got to see Dina K.'s sleepwalking FX performance AGAIN
rather
>>than Joana Juarez's lyrical spanish performance. My favorite part of Dinas
>>FX is right before her last pass when the
music is going crazy and she is
>>staring
blankly into space. You can't teach
that.
>
>It was also great to see all of Boguinskaya's
routines in event
>finals. I, for one, did not miss seeing Marinescu's beam at all, even
>if
she did medal.
>
Jordynn
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 22:00:56
-0500
From: ***@LULU.ACNS.NWU.EDU
Subject:
Re: Moceanu's injury
Hi everyone!
I've
been watching this story transpire over the past two weeks or so, and
I'm a
little worried about her condition, namely because I've had a stress
fracture, myself, in my left shin, and I'm still healing. I
must say it's
one of the more painful and
irritating overuse injuries that I have
experienced,
but I also must say that I am still healing even now, and the
initial fracture happened when I was a senior in high school
four years ago.
Guys, I don't know how many of you might have suffered
from stress
fractures, but based on my encounter,
I think there's kind of a huge
possibility that
she won't be able to compete. A bone is a bone, you can't
really trick it by taking tons of vitamins and attaching
extra electrodes
(we tried all of that with me).
The other thing that could happen is that,
if she
resumes training too early, not only will she impair the natural
healing process, but she'll also run the risk of suffering
from an actual
fracture. And THAT would be a
really bad scene. (BTW, my father is a
radiologist;
I didn't want you all to think that I was randomly flinging out
unsubstatiated bits of knowlege :)
Anyway, I just wondered what all of
you thought about the possibilty of her
not competing. Maybe she should wait along with Katie Teft and Jenny
Thompson-- rather than try to jump back
too early and risk injuring her self
to the point
of no return.
Just my $0.02
:)
--Meighan
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 23:01:32
-0400
From: ***@KENT.NET
Subject:
vault start values
What is the start value for a yurchenko
half front layout? Is there
another name for this vault?
Thanks
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 23:05:46
-0400
From: ***@KENT.NET
Subject:
Re: Rythmic Gymnastics
>Do rythmic gymnasts do any tumbling in their routines? If they don't it
>would seem pretty boring(no offense or anything to all those
rythmic gymnasts
>out
there) to me.
>
>BTW, what do IMO and IMHO stand
for?
>
>Andrew~
>
I'm no expert, but rythmic gymnasts don't really do much tumbling in the
artistic gymnastic style. They do perform elements
where they throw the ball/hoop/clubs/ribbon into
the air, and then do two or three elements before
catching it. i.e. rolls, illusion turns, etc.
I like to watch rythmic
gymnastics because
of the incredible flexibility
which most of them have. As well,
the dance
aspect is stressed a lot more than in
artistic gymnastics.
IMO stands for "in my
opinion".
IMHO stands for "in my humble opinion".
Jordynn
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 21:46:29
-0700
From: ***@VCN.BC.CA
Subject:
Olympics Tickets!!!
Hi! Everyone,
As of yesterday I have
decided to abandon my trip to see the O-Games, so
now
I got one ticket to each women's podium training session (total two
tickets). They
are the highest price ticket there is for podium train, I
imagine must be very good seat. If someone is interested please e-mail
me
privately, all I ask is a couple rolls of good
pictures in return. You
must contact me asap, time is
running out very quick.
Go! Amanda!
Thomas
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 01:52:28
+0000
From: ***@RMII.COM
Subject:
How to Unsubscribe/Switch Formats (GYMN Admin)
PLEASE send responses
to the predictions survey directly to the poster; do not
send
it to Gymn!
Obviously, Gymn's
Olympic traffic is already picking up.
If you are
concerned about too much mail
you can either switch to Digest format (if you
are
not already digest) or you can set Gymn to "nomail".
To Switch Formats, send a msg as follows:
To:
listserv@psuvm.psu.edu
Subject: <blank>
message:
set gymn-l digest
To set nomail, send a msg
as follows:
To: listserv@psuvm.psu.edu
Subject: <blank>
message:
set gymn-l nomail
Then, when
you're ready to turn Gymn back on, send a msg as follows:
To:
listserv@psuvm.psu.edu
Subject: <blank>
message:
set gymn-l mail
Your
subscription will then resume with all of your previous settings
(digest/mail, etc).
(Or,
you could always set up a mail filter to automatically delete all of
your incoming Gymn mail... =)
Rachele
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:44:59
+0000
From: ***@ALOHA.NET
Subject:
response to RSG questions and reports
Well, I guess
being one of the few RSG fans on this list, I felt it
my duty to rise in defense of the sport.....
To Andrew who made a comment about tumbling and RSG....
It
is important to remember that just because the word gymnastics
follows the word rhythmic this does not automatically mean
that
acrobatics/tumbling should be a key element
of the sport. There are
several key differences between artistic and rhythmic. The first and
obvious
difference is the apparatus--in artistic the apparatus is
static while in rhythmic the apparatus must be in constant
motion.
Tumbling, while spectacular in artistic is NOT ALLOWED in
rhythmic.
Only pre-acrobatic elements (e.g. forward/backward rolls,
walkover,
chest cartwheels) are allowed providing
there is no flight. The
basic gymnastic elements such as pivots, balances, and leaps
are also
highly emphasized in rhythmic. Extreme flexibility is another
aspect
that separates artistic and rhythmic
gymnasts.
Adding the manipulation of apparatus to the above elements
completes
the package "so to speak" of
this sport. While rhythmic may
seem
easy to the spectator--it is important to
remember that one of the
aims of gymnastics is to
make the performance of elements seem
effortless.
To
those media
people who participated in that AP poll regarding
which
sports should be dropped from the Olympics--shame, SHAME, SHAME
on all of you.
One wonders at the depth of knowledge these people
have about the sports they maligned. Beach volleyball certainly was
a surprise--this sport enjoys a large following throughout
the world.
Being from Hawaii, I also must defend sailboarding.
Synchronized
swimming--another all woman sport(do
we see a trend here?)
Just goes to show that the media again tends to
forget who they are
supposed
to serve.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:44:59
+0000
From: ***@ALOHA.NET
Subject: RSG on
TV
Hello folks!!!
Just wanted to point out to all gymnastics
fans in the US.....
Please remember that
although you might think that Olympic gymnastics TV
coverage
will end on July 30th--rhythmic coverage begins August 1st.
Here is
your chance to get more educated about the sport. According
to
official sources, NBC has promised USA Gymnastics that it will
provide increased coverage to rhythmic and will base future
coverage
of the sport on the response provided by
its viewers.
Please show your support for the sport of gymnastics-be
it artistic
or rhythmic. We certainly deserve all the coverage we
can get.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 20:44:59
+0000
From: ***@ALOHA.NET
Subject:
RSG group questions
Hello Sara,
Here are some answers to your
questions regarding the Rhythmic group
competition:
1. Group competition is a competitive
discipline in the sport of
rhythmic
gymnastics. The sport also has in
individual all around
event, individual apparatus
finals event, and a team event. The
team
event is different from group because it
combines the scores of the
routines of three
different individual gymnasts-much like the
artistic
team event.
In the group competition, each group is comprised of five
gymnasts
performing 2 routines-the first with
identical apparatus and the
second with 2
different apparatus. In this
Olympic year-the first
group discipline involves
the use of 5 hoops, and the second using 3
balls
and 2 ribbons. The FIG determines
which apparatus will be used
during the
competition year for groups. Next
year, the first
routine will involve the use of 5
balls. The second routine's
apparatus is yet to
be identified.
The aim of the group event is to show synchronization
among five
gymnasts. It is a very exciting event and much
more difficult than
the individual event because
each gymnast must be very aware of what
her fellow
group members are doing. Apparatus
exchanges are also
another spectacular feature of
the event.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 1996 01:05:33
-0700
From: ***@IX.NETCOM.COM
Subject:
Tickets Wanted!!!
Hey everyone--
If anyone has MAG Compulsory
Tickets, session 2 for July 20 and event
finals,
please let me know!!!
Kris Bagiu
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 9 Jul 1996 18:48:43
+1000
From: ***@OZEMAIL.COM.AU
Subject:
WAG predictions
Women's gymnastics is such a fickle sport. It really depends on being in
the right place at the right time.
Whoever hits on
the day will win - it'll be that close.
This could include
: Pods, Mo, Miller, Marinescu, Moceanu, Dawes, Amanar,
Khorkina or Kochetkova (in no
particular order).
Fingers crossed for one of the Aussie girls to make
the top 15!
As for favourites, I don't have
a particular favourite at the moment. But
my all
time favourite is Daniela Silivas.
Simone
------------------------------
End
of GYMN-L Digest - 8 Jul 1996 to 9 Jul 1996
***********************************************