GYMN-L Digest - 3 Apr 1996 to 4 Apr 1996
There
are 4 messages totalling 824 lines in this
issue.
Topics in this special issue:
1. Kim Zmeskal's
Comeback Attempt
2. Kim Zmeskal
3.
Statistics and gymnastics project
4. GYMN-L Digest - 4 Apr 1996 - Special issue
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 19:57:15
-0600
From: ***@MAIL.COIN.MISSOURI.EDU
Subject:
Re: Kim Zmeskal's Comeback Attempt
Hello,
fellow Gymners...
I just read with dismay and
disgust this recent post. Knocking the
members of Gymn is one thing, but dragging Kim Zmeskal's
name into this
is another. If you are as concerned
as I am, read on:
> " message"
was filled with personal insults toward me. I would have loved to
I really can't believe this. I
have seen Kim and she is as nice as can
be towards
everyone.
> it,........ THE WORLD. If the message was real, for
"great" Kim Zmeskal to
> e-mail me and spew filithy
insults, is sickening. You would think this woman
> would
have used that time to send positive responses to her fans, the people
>
who LOVE her, not throw s*** at a total stranger she
disagreed with. If I am
> so contemptible, as
the "supposed" Kim claims, why were you wallowing in the
> mud?
I will admit that I have had personal words with Mr. Andrews in
private mail. I made mention that I have met Kim. What
infuriates me is
that he seems to have dragged his
apparent hatred towards me and my
opinions into a
false "message" from Kim. My mail server let me know that
an outside source read my email address. I always took
security for
granted, but now I have second
thoughts. My only guess is that he somehow
forged
a "message" from Kim with my email address tagged on.
>
Olympics? Read the Atlanta Journal, Thursday, April 4. Call me a liar now.
I
> knew that old b**** wasn't going to the
Olympics six months ago. Anybody
> with any
sense knows she washed up.
I really wonder what is eating him so bad. I have never, _never_
seen
anyone on this forum call anyone a name like
that. If it is because of my
privately expressed
opinions with him, fine. But he has no right in
dragging
Kim into this. Come on, she may actually be reading this!
> HOW YA
LIKE ME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
After tonight,
not very well.
Thank you for allowing me to express my concerns. I love this forum
and its discussions, but this has gotten out of hand when
someone forges
_my_ name on a supposed
"message."
Email me with responses, please, for advice on what do do. I fear that
he has
infiltrated my system.
--Michael
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 18:15:36
-0800
From: ***@IX.NETCOM.COM
Subject:
Kim Zmeskal
You wrote:
>
>Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 20:05:56
-0500
>From: ***@INETNOW.NET
>Subject:
Kim Zmeskal's Comeback Attempt
>
>I
just saw an article in the Atlanta Journal today that said that Kim
>Zmeskal would not be attempting to make the 1996 Olympic
team. At first I
>was disappointed, but I was
not surprised.
>
>But tonight I got the most interesting e-mail
message it is from a man named
>Micheal L. Roge. He claims it was a forwarded message from Kim Zmeskal. This
>" message"
was filled with personal insults toward me. I would have loved to
>communicate with Kim Zmeskal by
e-mail. But if this is really her, I have no
>desire. This whole experience with the hatred and venom
spewed at me, has
>left a bad taste in my mouth
toward gymnastics.
>
>I find some of you people some of the most
closed-minded, hateful,
>vindictive people I
have ever had the chance to meet on all of my time of
>the internet. What I expected to be a pleasant, rewarding,
experience, has
>resulting in being absolutely
vile. For those of you who wish to ignore me
>and
call me personal insults, fine. But you can not ignore
the truth. NEVER!
>This is why you persecute me now.
>
>The
world knows the truth. Not the gymnastics osteriches
who WANT to ignore
>it,........ THE WORLD. If the message was real, for
"great" Kim Zmeskal to
>e-mail me and spew filithy
insults, is sickening. You would think this woman
>would
have used that time to send positive responses to her fans, the people
>who LOVE her, not throw s*** at a total stranger she
disagreed with. If I am
>so contemptible, as
the "supposed" Kim claims, why were you wallowing in the
>mud?
>
>For all of you who disagree with me,
you must hate the Atlanta
>Journal-Constitution, TIME Magazine, Joan
Ryan, countless newspapers and
>magazines,
WAGA-TV, Kristie Phillips, Brandy
Johnson, and a ton of other
>people. I got a
lot of my information was from these sources. Did they lie?
>Are you
saying TIME magazine lied? Kristie Phillips?
>
>Since you people
delight in insulting me personally in public, and private,
>I will
answer you here, in open public.
>
>Now I suppose I am telling
rumor and lies about Kim not trying for the
>Olympics? Read the Atlanta
Journal, Thursday, April 4. Call me a liar now. I
>knew
that old b**** wasn't going to the Olympics six months ago. Anybody
>with any sense knows she washed up.
>
>HOW YA
LIKE ME NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
OK ENOUGH!!!! I CANNOT BELIEVE YOU!!!! If you
have
such a distaste for gymnastics why don't you unsubscribe???? I
mean, GEEZ!!!! How dare you call Kim Zmeskal
a B****? Washed Up? And
what good have you ever
done? She is NOT washed up. We already knew
that
Kim isn't trying for another Olympics and no one said that you
lied. I think that you enjoy everyone arguing w/everyone. I
think that
you get a real kick over pissing people
off.
It's not fair to say those kind of things
about
Kim. Why are you so upset over that message that she supposedly
sent
you? It sounds like you don't believe it
yourself so what's the big
deal. I never said I
didn't like you. I just think that you need to be
more
careful about what you say. We are on this forum to talk about
gymnastics not call one of America's best gymnasts a B****.
I don't
think that you should call anyone washed
up unless you can prove that
they are. I know that
she isn't and so do millions of others. It's not
fair
to rag on some ones talents unless your ready to compete against
them.
Lets Please Try To Keep The
Peace Here Galfar.
Laura
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 18:22:47 -0400
From: ***@HALCYON.COM
Subject:
Statistics and gymnastics project
I have to do a project for my math
class on statistics and I want to do
something
related to gymnastics. One of my idea is the relation
between
the height of a gymnast and its level
(men, women, RSG), or level and
years spent in
training or age and hours of training. If somebody has an
idea please tell me, I really need help (I have to know what
my subject
is going to be by April 19th).
Thanks
a lot, you can e-mail me privately.
Chloe
------------------------------
Date: Thu, 4 Apr 1996 18:22:38
-0800
From: ***@U.WASHINGTON.EDU
Subject:
Re: GYMN-L Digest - 4 Apr 1996 - Special issue
Something happened to
these messages and all I got was Message #1. Can
you
explain this?
Thanks
kew
------------------------------
End
of GYMN-L Digest - 4 Apr 1996 - Special issue
*************************************************