GYMN-L Digest - 24 Jul 1995 to 25 Jul 1995
There
are 14 messages totalling 442 lines in this
issue.
Topics of the day:
1. What are some of these moves?
2. European Youth Olympics
3. Classic Questions (4)
4. Olympic Festival - Times and Dates?
(2)
5. Olympic Trials
6. Compulsories.
7. Full Twist Double Layout off uneven
bars
8. heights
of guys
9. heights\short
gymnasts
10. Chainey Umphrey
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 06:47:01
CST
From: ***@CCLINK.NET.UOKHSC.EDU
Subject:
Re: What are some of these moves?
Karen,
My son used to be in
gymnastics and when he went to optionals, we
bought
a book called "code of points" or something like that. That
book
helped us figure out what some moves were, the skill level
(A,B,C,...),
and it had pictures. It is an advanced book, it is the
one
used by judges and coaches to determine how the moves have to be
done.
There is probably a
book like that one for girls, but my
recommendation
is that you ask your daughter's coach first, they might
have
a way to introduce you into "optionals"
better than this. Also,
they
will have the address to request this book.
If you still want to
know about the book, let me know and I'll ask
around
the gym, to see if I can find out more about the girls "code of
points"
and where to get it.
Ligia.
______________________________
Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: What are some of
these moves?
Date:
7/24/95 9:51 PM
Hello:
As a recent subscriber and
a parent of a new gymnast (7 yrs old, < 1 year
in
gymnastics). She competed level five and will compete
level six in the fall.
I was wondering if anyone here is willing to explain
or point me to an
explanation of some of these
moves. I want to know more about
what they are
teaching my daughter to do...She is
firm in her level six skills and is now
learning
progressions to more advanced skills for level eight optionals...but
I
do not know what the final product is.
I have seen many names of
different moves but would not know the name by the
move
and a descriptive list would be great as well as what move usually goes
before.
Thanks in Advance
karen
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 18:12:00
BST
From: ***@IC.AC.UK
Subject:
Re: European Youth Olympics
> I was just wondering if this is the
young St. Petersburg gymnast who
> was allowed
to compete in the Goodwill Games as a substitute for the
> missing Hungarian team.
Yes this is the same
Eugenia Kusnezsova who was in last year's
Goodwill
Games.
> believe they
mentioned that she wasn't a member of the Russian team,
> even though she was wearing the team leotard. Do any of you know?
I believe
she was too young at the time... she's still a junior now!
Sherwin
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 15:38:25
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Classic Questions
I've got a few questions about the U.S. Classic:
1. Did Amy Chow only
do 3 rotations in optionals? It seemed, from the
report, that she was doing well. Why dropout?
2. Was there any explanation for Zmeskal and Moceanu's abscence? Can
Kim
compete in nationals?
3. Did J.
Thompson and Powell scratch in the middle of compulsories? D.
Thompson did only comp. beam, right?
Thanks,
Emily
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 16:20:32
-0400
From: ***@FREENET.CARLETON.CA
Subject:
Olympic Festival - Times and Dates?
Was rhythmic on July 23? Anyone tape it?
Will artistic
be on July 30?
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 17:10:44
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Re: Classic Questions
Emily writes:
>1. Did Amy
Chow only do 3 rotations in optionals? It seemed, from
thereport, that she was doing well.
Actually,she only did two
rotations(vault and bars.)She warmed up balance
beam
and floor(and nailed everything),but skipped them in the actual
competition.
>Why dropout?
I honestly
have no idea.*ALL* the world championship members
automatically
qualify to USA's,so
she didn't even have to compete at this meet.Dominique
and Jaycie were the only two from
worlds that finished the competition.I
don't think she was injured though.
>2. Was there any explanation for Zmeskal and Moceanu's abscence?
Not that I heard.
> Can Kim
compete in nationals?
It depends on the qualification rules set up by the USAG.Since she *IS* Kim
Zmeskal,I'm sure they'll let her compete anyway.
3.
Did J. Thompson and Powell scratch in the middle of compulsories?
Jennie
recieved a zero on vault.I didn't actually SEE it,but
I think she
might have balked and touched the
horse *OR* she scratched.She looked pretty
good on every event in warmups,but
still a little blah in her
peformances.Kristy
Powell finished the compulsory competition.She had a
few
problems with bars(two falls 8.225) and
beam(one fall 8.65)
>D.Thompson did only
comp. beam, right?
Correct.
-Shannon
was the best compulsory gymnast there(9.8 ,9.725,
9.85,
9.7).Everything was clean and crisp(best toe
on front half of the meet) and
doesn't look as
tired as she has this past year.
-Amanda breezed through one of the
best compulsory floors in the world.A
little wobbly on beam(9.475) but did well on the other
events.
-The newly shorn Strug looked fit.Her highest marks were on
FX(9.85) and
V(9.7).Had a few minorproblems
with bars(leg break on first pirouette 9.4)
and
beam(9.325)
-Jaycie Phelps just keeps
getting better and better.She's
improved
tremendously in both difficulty and
technical peformance since Dortmond.Watch
for her to shine next year.
-Changing gymsover the past few months are-
Kerri Strug-Colorado
Aerials
Jamie Martini-American
Twisters
Jennie Thompson-Dynamo(for this week anyway!)
Larissa Fontaine-Hills Angels
-Only
one out of 6 from Dynamos competed optionals(Jessica Rieland)
-Injured
were Larissa Fontaine(calf) and Tanya Maiers(?)Kellee Davis was a
no-show.
-Liz Reid is freakin'
gorgeous.Great dance and originality.Can be a bit
loose
at times.She's one of those too flexible gymnasts
like Juliet
Bangerter.Quite powerful considering
how tall and fragile looking she is.She
just needs the consistency and she'll be there.
-Out
of 36 competitors in the Sr. division only 20 of them completed the
meet.The top 20 qualify to USA's
so basically you could have qualified even
if you
fell 3 times on each event!! There was a 10 point
difference between
1st and 20th places.
Keep
the ?'s coming,
Billy
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 17:41:47
-0400
From: ***@AOL.COM
Subject:
Re: Olympic Trials
I 've been thinking about this Olympic Trials
discussion. I agree with Jeff
that there really isn't a FAIR way to choose the women's
team. But,
something
(almost anything) has got to be an improvement over what happened
in '92. I really
am in favor of selecting the team as close to the
competition
as possible. The
trials for the '91 World Champs. were held
3
weeks prior to the meet and the results speak
for themselves! However, I
realize that leaves everyone on pins and needles for a long
time, not knowing
whether they're on the team or not.
One
thing I think would improve the situation a little would be if they took
more than 8 from
the Olympic Trials (maybe 10 or 12). That way one person
(i.e. Kim Kelly) doesn't feel like she's the only one that's
left out. If
they
"cut" between 3-5 people, all the burden is no longer placed on
one
person...maybe a slight improvement??? It should be a little less
complicated next year, also, if two of the top contenders,
(i.e. Shannon and
Betty in '92) do not have to be petitioned on to the team
because of injury.
Keep your
fingers crossed!!
Amy
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 16:57:30
-0600
From: ***@ZEPHYR.MEDCHEM.PURDUE.EDU
Subject:
Compulsories.
Do they still over weigh compulsories at these meets (60/40)
against
optionals?
Jeff
------------------------------
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 1995 00:41:10
BST
From: ***@IC.AC.UK
Subject:
Full Twist Double Layout off uneven bars
I've just been watching bits
of European Olympic Days off TV, and
little
Russian Evgenia Kusnezsova
performed a full twisting double
layout somersault
off the uneven bars, probably for the first time
ever.
Sherwin
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 19:40:22
-0400
From: ***@UMICH.EDU
Subject:
Re: Olympic Festival - Times and Dates?
Yes, Rythmic
was on the 23rd, but it was not a lot...not a lot of
information
about the gymnasts etc...
When is artistic?
No
one is advertising it..
Anjel
Vahratian
> Was rhythmic on July 23? Anyone tape it?
>
> Will
artistic be on July 30?
>
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 17:30:43
-0700
From: ***@DANA.UCC.NAU.EDU
Subject:
Re: Classic Questions
> > Emily writes:
> > Can Kim
compete in nationals?
>
> It depends on the qualification rules
set up by
the USAG.Since she *IS* Kim
> Zmeskal,I'm sure they'll let her
compete anyway.
I
wouldn't bet on it - I remember there was some controversy over
Mary Lou's
qualifying to '85 trials or '86 nationals, and she was not
allowed to compete -- she announced her retirement from
competition
shortly thereafter, partially because
she *still* had to qualify for
everything. There's
a similar complaint from the Dynamo camp about
Shannon Miller, but the
rules are a little more lenient, and include
exceptions
for National and World medalists, or stuff like they only have
to compete compulsories, or perform in *1* event in Amer.
Cup qualifying
round, or weird stuff like
that.
Moral of the story: don't assume. There may be a small exemtion
that she fits under,
the USAG may make an exception, but don't hold your
breath.
>
-Changing gymsover the past few months are-
> Jennie Thompson-Dynamo(for
this week anyway!)
Ha!
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 20:00:26
-0600
From: ***@ZEPHYR.MEDCHEM.PURDUE.EDU
Subject:
Re: Classic Questions
Perhaps Mary Lou's denial was more a fact that
she was so out of shape that
she was not worth
competing for the US even if she made the team. If you
look
at Mary Lou in 1984 (phenonmenal, 1983 for that fact,
too), but at
the 1985 Am Cup she was so out of
shape, she looked ridiculous, adn
somehow won over Yu Feng. (Yu got
revenge at Mixed Pairs.)
Moral: They may let Kim do it if she is a
real possibility. I think that
the USGF was sick
of Mary Lou and gave her the First Ever "Thank you very
Much, but please go away award". They soon gave it to
Kristie Philips in 1988.
It may seem harsh, but that is how I
call it.
Next.
Jeff
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 17:19:54
-0700
From: ***@NETCOM.COM
Subject:
Re: heights of guys
Steve Craig
>
> Orion writes:
>
>
>Mihai Bagiu 5'9''
>
>Alexei Nemov 5'8''
> >Trent Dimas
5'8''
> >Zoltan Supola
5'8''?
> >Dmitri Bilozerchev 5'7'' or
5'8''?
> >Vitali Rudnitsky
5'7''?
> >John Roethlisberger 5'7''
>
> Being at
gatherings of other gymnasts, I always found myself to be one of the
> taller people.
Pretty good for the ego :)
>
> Steve - a towering
5'7"
You forget so soon, Charlie Lake ?
Charlie
is around 5-7 too. Kinda shook everyone up when this
"giant" made the
US Oly team a few
years back.
Course the man I have never had a chance to thank for his
inspiration,
Shawn Adamek, Stanford grad, of
Saugus CA, Shawn is like 6-2, did just great
in
NCAA meets, and he showed me that maybe I can do it even though Im 5-11.
Shawn, wherever you are, thanks dude
-texx
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 17:05:47
-0700
From: ***@NETCOM.COM
Subject:
Re: heights\short gymnasts
>
> Someone mentioned the shorter
gymnasts around. Do they still
> count after
they get taller? :-) Actually, I was wondering
> recently
about some of the female gymnasts who seem to have
> stopped
growing and are still under 5', especially Kerri Strug,
Well
like they say "Better life through superior pharmacology"
Modern
science has given us the ability to muck with little girls
endocrine systems, stunt their growth, manipulate the
timing
of their onset of puberty etc.
These
advances, or rather their use in the female counterpart of mens
gymn,
have caused me to
begin equating girls gymn with child abuse.
I
have turned against the sport like a rabid dog against its master.
My nagative attitude is frequently mistaken for mysoginy.
You will also notice that I make frequent
references to girls gymn.
Unfortunately,
some people think that being #1 is all that matters.
Sad
for the sport.
I still to hope to hook at
least on of my neices on gymnastics.
Selfishly
so that I will have at least one thing in coimmon
with SOMEONE in
that household !
I will also
forbid her fom getting too serious about
competition.
I think its called "giving a damn about our
kids"....
First time anyone on the team even THINKS about
needles,
someones going
to do a face plant in the parking lot from the roof of the gym !
>
who was one of the *shorter* members of the '94 Worlds
team,
> and Kim Zmeskal,
who seemed closer to Dominique's height than
> Svetlana's when they've
shown clips of them training together
> on
TV. Does anyone have current height
listings for them?
> -Emily of Waco (AUNTMOOSE@delphi.com)
"Aunt
Moose", now THATS the greatest handle on the net Ive
seen in a LONG time !
I LOVE IT
!
-texx
PS:
Give
my regards to Baylor Univ !
(Go Austin Longhorns!)
------------------------------
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 18:39:44
-0700
From: ***@NETCOM.COM
Subject:
Re: Chainey Umphrey
Ann
Marie Eckhart
>
> I was channel surfing today and ran across a
"Mr. Roger's Neighborhood"
> featuring
a 15-year-old Chainey (before the hunky arms) doing
p-bars, pommel
> horse, high bar, and floor (he
said he sometimes performed floor to music and
> had
Mr. Rogers put some on!). Didn't he
just recently make another
> appearence
on the show?
>
> Ann Marie
Which one ?
Greg or Chainey ?
-texx
------------------------------
End
of GYMN-L Digest - 24 Jul 1995 to 25 Jul 1995
*************************************************